Analysis Of The Narrative By Ayub Suleiman Diallo

Introduction Slavery and slave trade refers to the exchange of human being especially the black for goods. The trade took place across the transatlantic ocean in the 17th century. The ships trading the slaves would sail from Europe carrying goods to West Africa. In West Africa, the goods were exchanged for slaves who were captured by the African traders. The traders from Europe found it easier to work with African intermediaries who raided the African settlements from the coast of Africa and brought the energetic young people to be sold as slaves (Quirk). The paper will focus on the issues of slave trade and slavery, and the following experts of personal narratives will be used. Firstly, the paper will analyze the personal narrative by John Barbot in which he describes the state of slavery in Africa. Secondly, there will be the analysis of the narrative by Ayub Suleiman Diallo, in which he recall how he was captured and taken to slavery. Thirdly, the paper will use the narrative by young Olaudah Equiano, who remembers how he was kidnapped into slavery. Lastly the analysis on kidnapping story by venture Smith while at the age of six will be used in the paper. The analysis of the narratives According to John Barbot, who was an agent of a company dealing with the slave trade, he managed to take two voyages of slaves to the west coast of Africa between 1678 and 1682. According to this agent, the slaves who were sold by their fellow black people mainly include the prisoners of

The Apartheid Of The Vietnam War - 1723 Words

In the year 1959, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) protested the Vietnam War and other injustices within America, and they only dissented peacefully. But from this came another organization so radical that other radical liberals disowned them. The group stemmed from SDS and many of their members originated in the peaceful movement; however, they grew tired of the miniscule results of nonviolence. The association was ready to do more than hold up signs and hope that someone would listen. They were prepared to destroy and they were prepared for people to get hurt. They were the Weathermen. Their violence ranged from the destruction of buildings, to the injury and murder of innocents and police. Primarily, The Weathermen aimed to†¦show more content†¦In order to advocate for the end of the Vietnam War, SDS used forms of resistance that seemed to be too radical for most other groups of the time. One action that set them apart from others was their defiance of the gove rnment as they refused to be drafted for the war and on some occasions would openly set fire to the letters. Some significant members of SDS, such as Bernardine Dohrn and John Jacobs, wished to hold all of the leadership roles in the association. Attempting to differentiate themselves from other sects of SDS, Jacobs wrote the â€Å"Weatherman Paper† and marked it with the signatures of other members including Dohrn, Jeff Jones, Mark Rudd, Bill Ayers, Terry Robbins, Jim Mellen, and Howie Machtinger. The paper did not address issues separately; it composed all concerns into one global struggle of the oppressed versus the oppressors. After the election of the Weathermen as the leaders of SDS, the group became a reality. While the focus of the Weathermen at the time was ending America’s destructive presence in Vietnam, they had other goals in the long run. Because of their objective to end racism, the organization had hoped to bring in many African American members and be able to fight with groups such as the Black Panthers; however, the group remained predominantly white as almost no black Americans wanted to join. The Weathermen also aimed to break gender stereotypes and sexism, and developed new rules surrounding monogamy. Every member who was in a

Preistleys main aim Essay Example For Students

Preistleys main aim Essay Birlings character does not develop at all through the play. At the end he is still just as mean and tight fisted as he was in the beginning. The only thing that concerns him about the tale of the poor girl is his humiliation at the hands of the public when the scandal is reported. He berates Eric, not because of what he did to the girl, but for adding to their problems. Birling is also incredibly insensitive. He cannot understand why the Inspector is surprised and disgusted when he tells them that he fired the girls. He just counts being cold hearted and mean as part of his job. He only cares about climbing the ladder, not whether anyone gets hurt while he does it. This attitude is one that Preistley dislikes the most and is the opposite of socialism. In conclusion, Birling is the opposite of everything that Preistley believes in and is the one that Preistley uses the most in showing that society is immoral. He is the classic capitalist who would have viewed Preistley as a crank and do-gooder. I think that the play-writ succeeds in his aim with Birling as by the end you view him as an evil, mean, industrialist. Mrs. Birling is the wife of Arthur Birling. Nearly as cruel and intolerant as her husband, she is very stubborn. Preistley uses her to show that it is not just men who are the barrier to the unification of society. Her view on the world, although she is mean and cruel, is through rose-tinted spectacles. She cannot imagine that Eric has been drinking at all, let alone heavily as this quote demonstrates Mrs. B. Eric? Oh Im afraid he may have had rather too much to drink tonight. We were having a little celebration here- Inspector Isnt he used to drinking? Mrs. B. No, of course not. Hes only a boy. This quote also shows Mrs. Birlings reluctance to treat her offspring as equals. Right the way the play she treats them as if they are both very small children. This fact also shows her similarity to her husband. When it emerges that she had spoken to the dead girl two weeks ago and she had, in effect, killed her, she still shows no remorse and believes she did the right thing because the girls plight sounded ridiculous to me. Her crime in relation to Eva Smith is possibly the worst. Mrs Birling is the one that had the chance to save her from her awfully premature demise and she chose to let it go because she was so pompous. She believes that a girl of a subordinate class could not have high enough morals to stop accepting stolen money. As if a girl of that sort would ever refuse money! This woman is also absurdly short sighted. She is incapable of imagining that her son could have had a relationship with this girl. With this character Preistley fulfils his aim very well indeed. The character is beautifully written and you really do get a sense of how mean and pompous she is. Her treatment of her children, the Inspector, Gerald and her husband all exemplify the things that Preistley hated about his society.